This is an objectively presented site built with Grok Build 4.5

Ivermectin, fenbendazole & mebendazole — what does the research say?

An overview of studies, registries and experience worldwide — Asia, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East and integrative traditions — not only the US/EU. Summaries in English; every source linked in the original.

Preclinical Phase I–II Registry (NCT) Case series Reviews

Three substances — three tracks

All three are antiparasitic drugs under investigation for oncology drug repurposing. Evidence levels differ.

Ivermectin · IVM

Macrocyclic lactone

Approved for certain human parasite infections. Extensive preclinical cancer data; human oncology still early (trials, observation).

Read more →
Fenbendazole · FBZ

Benzimidazole (veterinary)

Used against worms in animals. Cell and animal studies show microtubule and metabolism effects. Few formal human cancer RCTs.

Read more →
Mebendazole · MBZ

Benzimidazole (human)

Approved human anthelmintic. Strongest formal tracks against cancer: Michigan case, Johns Hopkins preclinical + phase I, Egypt mCRC, etc.

Read more →

Protocols by cancer stage

Investigational overviews for stages I–II: what standard care involves, and how IVM/FBZ/MBZ appear in literature and registries. Not approved treatment — standard care with an oncologist always comes first.

Overview

Stages I–III

Frame for reading the protocol pages: standard care, investigational tracks, questions for the oncologist.

Open protocols →
Stage I

Localized disease

Early disease, high curative potential with standard care; investigational adjuncts as conversation — not replacement.

Stage I →
Stage II

Locally more extensive

Often multimodal adjuvant plans; formal IVM/MBZ trials more often enroll advanced disease.

Stage II →

How we label evidence

LevelMeaningExamples on this site
APublished RCT / phase II–III with outcomesPatil 2022; Egypt mCRC MBZ
BPhase I safety / prospective cohortGallia 2021; Hulscher 2026
CCase series / case reportsMichigan ACC; FBZ self-admin series
DCell / animal studiesTang; Dogra; Bai (Hopkins)
ESystematic or narrative reviewRobalino; Chai; ReDO
RRegistry entry (ongoing/planned)NCT05318469, NCT07487805, NCT01729260

The positive dominates the map

Cells, animals, case reports, real-world and early human studies worldwide point in the same direction. Formal “negative” cancer RCTs are few and narrow — that is why you rarely hear them.

Lab & animals

Hundreds of papers: growth inhibition, apoptosis, microtubules, glucose, immune activation, synergy with chemo/ICI.

Positive map →

Humans

Michigan 19 mo; Hopkins OS 21 mo; Egypt mCRC; Hulscher cohort; ASCO PR; Tippens/case series.

USA →

World

China, Korea, India, Latin America, Africa, integrative practice — not only one Western clinic.

World →

Short list of the few formal limitations: see here.

Pets — parasite pressure & caregiver burden

Shared spaces + less routine deworming → more infection → sick pets → caregiver burden (owner exhaustion). Resistance is real but precise. Processes and sources under the Pets menu.

Overview Processes Sources

USA — positive signals

Michigan case (MBZ, 19 mo stability), Johns Hopkins phase I (median OS 21 mo), Cedars-Sinai IVM+ICI (1 PR interim), Florida ICONIC, Tippens narrative, etc.

Open USA page →

Beyond “western medicine” only

WHO global parasite programs, Korean and Chinese research, Indian and Egyptian trials, Japanese toxicology, Latin American patient practice, Ayurveda/TCM context.

Asia

Korea · China · Japan · India

FBZ social phenomenon in Korea, IVM mechanisms from Chinese labs, Ōmura discovery, Indian phase II GBM.

Read more →
Global South

Africa · Latin America · Egypt

WHO MDA, onchocerciasis, Loa loa safety, Egyptian mCRC RCT with mebendazole, patient-driven IVM use.

Read more →
Tradition & integrative

Ayurveda · TCM · folk protocols

IVM/FBZ/MBZ are modern molecules — but they meet traditional and integrative practice in real life.

Read more →